By: Khomotso Fredah Matlala
The Erosion of Agency: Navigating Decision Fatigue and the “Stolen Choice” in Epilepsy
INTRODUCTION:
Epilepsy is defined as sudden and recurring unprovoked seizures (World Health Organization, 2024). Although epilepsy is a neurobiological disorder, for many individuals the “interictal period” or, the time between seizures, carries the heaviest psychological burden. Studies highlight that beyond the physical events, people with epilepsy (PWE) often navigate a complex landscape of psychiatric comorbidities: with approximately 50% of individuals experiencing depression or anxiety over their lifetime (Kwon & Jetté, 2025). While clinical management of epilepsy traditionally focuses on seizure frequency, recent research highlights the profound impact of initiating and controlling one’s actions.
A critical, yet under-discussed, component of this burden is the erosion of personal agency. Living with epilepsy necessitates a continuous, high-stakes internal dialogue: Is this light a trigger? Have I slept enough? Can I safely take this walk? This constant monitoring leads to a psychological state where the finite mental resources required for constant risk assessment becomes depleted known as decision fatigue (Dewar et al., 2021; Kwon & Jetté, 2025). This article explores how chronic epilepsy induces “decision fatigue” through constant risk-assessment and how native loads combined with structural life limitations, leads to a perceived loss of autonomy. This article also proposes a framework of “Micro-Agency” to mitigate these effects.
THE NEUROLOGY OF IMPAIRED DECISION-MAKING:
Research by Novak et al., 2022, highlights that PWE frequently have cognitive impairment, including deficits in memory, attention and executive function. Decision-making is a fundamental, high-order executive process; studies using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) demonstrate that patients with epilepsy show significant impairments in this area compared to healthy controls, even when in clinical seizure remission (Novak et al., 2022). This indicates that the loss of agency in epilepsy is not merely a psychological reaction but has clear neurobiological roots.
Cognitive impairments in epilepsy are often linked to:
- Frontal Lobe Dysfunction: The frontal lobe supports executive functions such as decision-making, planning, and task initiation. Focal seizures in the frontal lobe can lead to executive judgment deficits, making it difficult for the brain to regulate risk perception and self-regulation (Novak et al., 2022).
- Pathological “Electrical Buzz”: Research indicates that transient bursts of high-frequency electrical activity, specifically interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) can acutely impair cognition and “clear thinking” even when no visible seizure is occurring (Kleen et al., 2021). These “micro-seizures” disrupt the neural synchronization required for complex processing.
- Cognitive Loading: The mental resources required to manage a chronic condition are finite. Chronic mental strain creates a “cognitive tax,” which alters attention and increases vulnerability to cognitive biases (Schwenk et al., 2024). This constant state of high load effectively “crowds out” the executive capacity needed for intentional decision-making.
THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF THE “STOLEN CHOICE”
The “Stolen Choice” can be defined as the loss of independence regarding major life milestones. In the medical field, this is often viewed through the lens of a conflict between beneficence known as the clinician’s ethical duty to ensure patient safety and autonomy, which is the patient’s right to self-determination (Zvonar et al., 2022). Things such as driving restrictions, career limitations, and pervasive social stigmatization often force patients to prioritize physical safety over personal desire (Jacoby & Baker, 2021). This forced prioritization creates a state of “stagnation” and frustration where the individual’s life trajectory is paused by medical necessity; research indicates that this perceived loss of control is a primary driver of the “interictal” psychological burden (Dewar et al., 2021; Fisher et al., 2020).
RECLAIMING AUTONOMY THROUGH “Micro-Agency”
To mitigate the erosion of agency, psychological interventions must move beyond seizure management to focus on reclaiming control. Evidence-based strategies include:
- Cognitive Offloading: Reducing decision fatigue by automating low-stakes daily choices such as medication routines and environmental triggers, thereby saving mental “energy” for meaningful executive tasks (Schwenk et al., 2024). This technique effectively lowers the “cognitive tax” imposed by chronic illness management.
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): Research suggests that ACT can help patients act in alignment with their personal values even in the presence of unpredictable symptoms, effectively decoupling their identity from their diagnosis (Hosseini et al., 2022; Graham et al., 2016). This shift from “avoidance” to “values-based action” is critical for reducing anticipatory anxiety.
- Micro-Agency Rituals: Engaging in small, safe activities that are entirely independent of one’s health status to prove to the brain that the individual still possesses “authorship” over segments of their life (Gibson et al., 2012). By mastering these “micro-moments,” patients can counteract the neurobiological state of learned helplessness and rebuild self-efficacy (Dewar et al., 2021).
In conclusion, acknowledging that epilepsy is a disorder of “agency” as much as it is of “electricity” allows for more holistic care. By addressing decision fatigue and building micro-zones of autonomy, patients can navigate the “stolen choices” of epilepsy and regain their status as the primary authors of their lives.
References
Dewar, J., Gumley, A., & Caswell, H. (2021). The experience of loss of self in people with epilepsy: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Seizure, 86, 140–150. doi.org
Fisher, N. J., & Reilly, C. (2020). The psychosocial impact of epilepsy on the individual and family. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 20(10), 41. doi.org
Graham, C. D., Gouick, J., Krahé, C., & Gillanders, S. (2016). A systematic review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in chronic health conditions: Outcomes and theoretical mechanisms. Clinical Psychology Review, 46, 46–58. doi.org
Hofmann, W., et al. (2012). Everyday executive functions: Predictors of self-regulation and self-control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1269-1280. Source
Hosseini, S., et al. (2022). The effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on cognitive emotion regulation and social self-efficacy in patients with epilepsy. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 13(1), 161–178. doi.org
Jacoby, A., & Baker, G. A. (2021). Stigma in epilepsy: Its presence, its effects, and its determinants. The Lancet Neurology, 4(9), 565–576. doi.org
Kleen, J. K., et al. (2021). Continuous subclinical brain activity and its effects on cognitive fluctuating states in epilepsy. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2534. doi.org
Kwon, C. S., Rafati, A., Ottman, R., & Jetté, N. (2025). Psychiatric comorbidities in persons with epilepsy compared with persons without epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurology, 82(1), 72–84. doi.org
Novak, A., Vinter, A., & Borojević, T. (2022). Cognitive impairment in people with epilepsy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(1), 267. doi.org
Schwenk, M., et al. (2024). The cognitive tax of chronic illness: Meta-analysis of executive functioning and resource depletion. Journal of Health Psychology, 29(2), 115–130. doi.org
World Health Organization. (2024). Epilepsy: Fact Sheet. www.who.int
Zvonar, V., et al. (2022). Autonomy, beneficence, and the patient-physician relationship in epilepsy care. Epilepsy & Behavior, 128, 108560. doi.org
